To Imprint Or Not To Imprint? This Is My Dilemma
I haven't updated the blog in a while as I've been a little busy. For instance, I was up until 4am last night working on a paper for one of my Art History classes. Of course, I didn't start the paper until 2am, so it all makes sense in the end.
Anyway, that's hardly the issue. I was checking to see if any comments had been updated and, lo and behold, there were new comments for my review of Man on Fire. One consisting of Becca defending Rotten Tomatoes to no avail, and the other from Dave.
Apparently, Dave goes to my school (good ol' University of Waterloo). Dave likes my writing style. Dave said I should submit my reviews to Imprint, the school newspaper. Dave is a good name. Fun to repeat.
Should I bother submitting my reviews to Imprint? Would they really be crazy enough to publish them? Would I publish under §panky® or Jeffery Bennett? Was Dave drunk at the time he read my reviews?
So many questions.
Feel free to answer them for me. I'm too tired to think aboot such silliness.
posted by §panky® @ 9/23/2004 04:58:00 p.m.
3 comments
3 Comments:
"Dave" is a good name to repeat. So is "Jabberwocky". Jabberwocky, Jabberwocky, Jabberwocky, Jabberwocky, Jabberwocky, Jabberwocky........................ My theory is, Dave was drunk, but nonetheless, correct. My proof:
1) Don't you have to be drunk to work for a school newspaper?
2) Everyone loves your reviews. Even the Brits! That has to mean something.
I have spoken, now ALL MUST CONCUR!!! CONCUR DAMN YOU!!!
I cuncur with 'Anonymous'. Publish as §panky®. DO IT NOW!!! :P Publish as §panky®. Publish as §panky®. Publish as §panky®. Publish as §panky®.
"Beware the Jabberwock, my son,
The jaws that bite, the claws that catch."
Post a Comment
<< Home